Rt.Hon. Professor Sir Robin Jacob

Rt.Hon. Professor Sir Robin Jacob

Sir Robin Jacob is the Sir Hugh Laddie Chair of Intellectual Property Law at UCL and acts as an arbitrator, mediator, expert determiner and expert witness both in IP and commercial cases. He is a member of the following arbitral bodies LCIA, the ICC, SIAC, KLRC and HKIAC.

Having read Natural Sciences at Trinity College Cambridge, Sir Robin then simultaneously read for the Bar and took an LLB from the LSE. He was called to the Bar by Gray’s Inn in 1965.

He practiced at the IP Bar from 1967, was appointed Queen’s Counsel in 1981 and had a busy international practice (Hong Kong, Singapore, Europe, USA, Australia) until he was appointed to the Bench in 1993. From 1997 to 2001 he was Supervising Chancery Judge for Birmingham, Bristol and Cardiff. Sir Robin was appointed a Lord Justice of Appeal in October 2003.

In the Court of Appeal he regularly sat on both IP and commercial cases. He formally retired from the Court of Appeal in May 2011 to take up his current appointment, continuing to sit from time to time in the Court of Appeal until April 2016.

He is Hon. Fellow of the LSE, an Hon. Fellow of St Peter’s College, Oxford, an Hon. LID of the University of Wolverhampton, Hon. President of the UK branch of the Licensing Executive Society, Hon. President of the Association of Law Teachers and a member of the Advisory Board of the European Law Centre of King’s College London.  He was Treasurer of Gray’s Inn in 2007 and a Governor of the LSE from 1996 to 2016.

Sir Robin is President of the Intellectual Property Judges’ Association (the association of European IP, particularly patent, judges). He was Chairman of the Advisory Panel on the Selection and Training of Judges for the forthcoming Unitary Patent Court until the UK withdrew from the project.

  • Recent work

    Sir Robin is very active in IP matters across the world, acting as an expert witness for proceedings in other countries (most recently in the USA, Japan, Canada, Malta, India, the European Trade Mark Office and France). He has been cross-examined as an expert witness on English law in New York and San Francisco arbitrations and in the High Court of Delhi. He was an ICC appointed panellist for “community objections” to top level domain names and is a panel member of SIAC, the LCIA, HKIAC and KLRC. He undertakes advisory work provided it is compatible with the other work he does.

    Sir Robin’s judicial experience is often called upon where he is engaged to sit as a “mock” judge at a “mock hearing” organised by a party in a case about to take place at all levels of the court system. The party’s actual counsel appears for the party and a barrister or solicitor appears for the other side.  The purpose is to gain an outsider’s opinion of the strengths and weaknesses of the party’s case.  He has conducted about 20 such hearings which are proving increasingly popular in high value litigation.

    He is also regularly instructed to act as a mediator in substantial actions and is interested in early neutral evaluation.

    He is a member of the following arbitral bodies: SIAC, HKIAC, KLIAC, LCIA, CIArb and the International Arbitration Centre in Tokyo. He undertakes work as an arbitrator. Two substantial arbitrations (one in Zurich the other in Kuala Lumpur) have gone to final awards. Others to which he was appointed have settled mainly but not always at an early stage. He is currently chairing a major arbitration in Hong Kong. He was a judge of the Astana International Financial Centre Court in Kazakhstan until 2020. He continues to be a member of the panel of arbitrators of that Centre.

    He was appointed by the Chinese Competition Authority (MOFCOM) as one of two “Trustees” to monitor the compliance of Nokia of its commitment to MOFCOM not to change its licensing policy under its Standard Essential Patents, a requirement of MOFCOM’s approval of Nokia’s sale of its mobile phone handset business (but not the relevant patents) to Microsoft. That appointment was extended to compliance by Alcatel-Lucent when that company was acquired by Nokia. The appointments expired in in 2022 when the monitoring periods expired.

  • Legal career

    Career as a High Court Judge and Court of Appeal Judge (1993 – 2011)

    When Sir Robin was appointed as a High Court Judge in 1993 he became one of only a small number of specialist designated Patents Court Judges.

    In October 2003, he was appointed a Lord Justice of Appeal of the Court of Appeal, the second most senior court in the UK legal system. During his time as a Judge, Sir Robin wrote many leading judgments in intellectual property law cases and is regarded as one of the UK’s, and Europe’s, leading intellectual property judges of recent times.

    In 2011, his fellow European Judges elected him President of the Intellectual Property Judges’ Association, an association of European patent judges. He continues to be President even though he has formally retired from being a Judge. He is regularly consulted on IP matters by the UK government and, until Brexit, the European Commission.

    Until the UK decided not to participate in the Unified Patent Court he was Chairman of the Advisory Panel to the Preparatory Committee (the main function of this was to advise on judicial appointments and training) and a member of the Preparatory Committee’s Expert Panel. He was a member of the European Commission’s Expert Group on the development and implications of patent law in the field of biotechnology and genetic engineering until the Group reported in May 2016.

    He was a Governor of the Expert Witness Institute from its foundation until 2004 and is now a Governor again. He was Treasurer of Gray’s Inn in 2007. He was awarded the Outstanding Achievement in IP award by MIP in 2012. He was a member of the Scientific and Advisory Board of the European Patent Office during its existence and is regularly consulted on IP matters by the European Commission and the UK government.

    Sir Robin formally retired from the Court of Appeal in May 2011 in order to become the Sir Hugh Laddie chair at UCL, occasionally sitting again in the Court of Appeal on cases where additional IP expertise was required, up until 2016.

    Legal career as a barrister (1965 – 1993)

    From 1976 to 1981 he was the Junior Counsel for the Comptroller of Patents and for UK Government departments in intellectual property. He was appointed Queen’s Counsel (“QC”) in 1981. His practice often took him abroad and he practiced as an advocate or legal adviser in Hong Kong, Singapore, the USA, Australia and in several European countries, as well as before the European Patent Office.

    Sir Robin was a member of the leading intellectual property set, 8 New Square, from 1965 – 1993 until his appointment as a High Court Judge.

    Academic Studies and early legal career (1960 – 1967)

    Sir Robin read Natural Sciences (physics) at Trinity College Cambridge (1960 to 1963) and then law at the London School of Economics (1963 to 1967). He was called to the Bar in 1965. At the Bar, as a barrister and trial advocate, he practiced mainly, but not exclusively, in all types of intellectual property law.

  • Academic career

    Sir Robin retired from the Court of Appeal to take up the Sir Hugh Laddie Chair of Intellectual Property Law at University College London.

    Sir Robin currently holds the following academic and professional positions:

    • Sir Hugh Laddie Chair of Intellectual Property Law at University College London;
    • Director of the Institute of Brand and Innovation law (IBIL) at University College London;
    • Member of the Scientific and Advisory Board of the European Patent Office. Hon. Fellow of the London School of Economics;
    • Governor of the London School of Economics;
    • Hon. Fellow of St Peter’s College, Oxford University;
    • Hon. LLD of the University of Wolverhampton;
    • President of the Intellectual Property Institute;
    • Hon. President of the UK branch of the Licensing Executive Society;
    • Hon. President of the Association of Law Teachers;
    • Member of the Advisory Board of the European Law Centre of King’s College London;
    • Governor of the Expert Witness Institute from its foundation until 2004 and is again Governor.

    Sir Robin was awarded the Outstanding Achievement in IP award by Managing Intellectual Property magazine in 2012.

  • Publications

    Books

    Sole author “IP and other Things” Hart, 2015

    In collaboration with others

    • A Guidebook to Intellectual Property (7 editions from 1970 to 2022)
    • Kerly’s Law of Trade Marks and Trade Names (1972, 1983 and 1986 editions, editor; 2001, 2005 and forthcoming editions, consulting editor)
    • Encyclopaedia of UK and European Patent Law (from 1977 onwards)
    • The White Book (once the Supreme Court Practice, now Civil Procedure) Sweet and Maxwell, editor of sections on intellectual property for many years from 1970 to 1993, Supervisory Editor thereafter.
    • Bullen & Leake & Jacob Precedents of Pleadings for many editions author of the various parts concerned with Intellectual Property, currently Consulting Editor
    • Atkin’s Court Forms. Editor of the sections concerned with Intellectual Property in the 1970s and 1980s
  • Articles & lectures
    • Information Problems and the Law, The Information Scientist, March 1972 p.3
    • The Protection of Geographical Indications of Origin in the UK, chapter in Protection of Geographic Denominations of Goods and Services, ed. Prof. Herman Cohen Jehoram, Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1980.
    • The Herschel Smith Lecture 1993, [1993] EIPR 312
    • Novelty of Use Claims, IIC (1996) Vol 27 170 (also published in German GRUR (1996) Vol 45 p.1091), a paper for the 7th Symposium of European Patent Judges
    • The Stephen Stewart Memorial Lecture: Industrial Property – Industry’s Enemy? [1997] I.P.Q. 3
    • European Patent Procedure, a paper for the 1997 Fordham University Law School IP conference
    • When is a trade mark not a trade mark? for the 1997 Fordham University Law School IP ConferenceThe Harmonisation of Patent Litigation, a lecture given to the Dutch AIPPI Group in Zeist Holland, March 1997, [1997] I.P.Q. 142
    • Some Recent Cases of Significance in the UK, IIC (1997) Vol 28 880 (also published in German, GRUR Int 1/98) a paper for the 8th Symposium of European Patent Judges
    • Community Intellectual Property Law in the English Courts, Chap. 15 of European Community Law in the English Courts, ed. Andenas and Jacobs, Clarendon Press, 1998
    • Towards a European Civil Procedural Code? The 27th Lord Upjohn Lecture, (1998) The Law Teacher, 125
    • The future shape of the judicial system in Europe a paper for the Ninth Symposium of European Patent Judges, Special Edition of the EPO Journal. 1999 p.114
    • Objectionable Narrowness of Claim, a “Side Bar” in Principles of Patent Law, Chisum et al., Foundation Press New York, (1999) also published in [1999] EIPR 40 along with subsequent correspondence
    • Decisions relating to patents granted by the EPO in Great Britain and Germany, (1999) VPP-Rundbrief 13
    • Scope of patents in the UK – is there a doctrine of equivalents? for the AIPPI, Symposium, Helsinki, March 1999, published in Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd
    • Can European Patent Specifications be Safely Shortened?, a paper for the FICPI conference, The Hague July 1999
    • International Intellectual Property Litigation in the Next Millennium, The 1999 Deioma lecture, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law (2000) vol. 32 p.507
    • Intellectual Property in the new Millennium The Inaugural Presidential Address of the Shepherd and Wedderburn Centre for Research in Intellectual Property and Technology, Edinburgh, 1999
    • The Community Patent or a European Patent Court? Is it time to Chose?, for the 2000 Fordham University Law School IP conference
    • Trade Marks and the Olympic Games throughout the Years, Marques Conference: Athens August 2000, [2001] EIPR 1
    • In Honour of Rudiger Rogge, Festshrift fur Rudiger Rogge zum 65. GRUR, October 2001
    • The Onward March of Intellectual Property Rights and Remedies, Chap. 17 of Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property, OUP 2001
    • The Grays Inn Reading, June 2002, Gresham College
    • Thoughts on Insolvency Practitioners and Expert Witnesses, a paper for the R3 Conference, Malaga, May 2003, Insolvency Law and Practice (2003) Vol. 19 143
    • My Dad and Gray’s Inn, (2002) 114 Graya 41
    • Law and the Human Genome Project, a paper for the Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, Symposium, 2003, Perspectives on properties of the Human Genome Project, ed. F. Scott Kieff, Elsevier/Academic Press, 2003.
    • Creating the Community Patent and its Court, an essay in Intellectual Property in the New Millennium, Essays in Honour of William Cornish, (2004) Cambridge p.79
    • The Perfect Patent Court, an essay in …”.. und sie bewgt sich doch!” Patent Law on the Move, a Festschrift for Gert Kolle and Dieter Stauder, Carl Heymanns Verlag (2005) p. 313
    • The Globalisation of Copyright, for the 12th Biennial Copyright Law & Practice Symposium, Sydney, November 2005. Copyright Reporter (2006) Vol 24 p.10
    • Interpretation of Claims and the Doctrine of Equivalents, for the 13th Symposium of European Patent Judges, 2006, Special Edition of the EPO Journal, 2007 p.138
    • European Patent Litigation: Out of the Impasse? With Prof. Anthony Arnull, [2007] EIPR 209
    • National Courts and the EPO Litigation System an essay in Festbeiträge für Rudolf Teschmacher zum 65, (2008) GRUR Int 658
    • Monopolist v Antimonopolist: A never ending story: The Burrell lecture 2008
    • Recent Patent Cases in England and Wales, for the 14th Symposium of European Patent Judges, Special Edition of the EPO Journal, 2009, p.139
    • Woolly Lines in Intellectual Property Law, an essay in Patents and Technological Progress in a Globalized World, Liber Americiom Joseph Straus, Springer (2009) p. 781
    • Experts and Woolf: Have Things Got Better?, an essay in The Civil Procedure Rules Ten Years On, ed. Dwyer, OUP (2009)
    • Knowledge of the World and the Act of Judging, the Congrés de La Magistrature, Québec City, November 2008, Proceedings of the 2008 Judges’ Conference, p. 129
    • The Chapter on Intellectual Property in The Judicial House of Lords 1876-2009 ed. Blom-Cooper et al., OUP 2009
    • Patents and Pharmaceuticals, a paper given in November 2008 at the Presentation of the Directorate-General of Competition’s Preliminary Report of the Pharm-sector inquiry, CIPA December 2008 p. 711
    • Forward to The Common Law of Intellectual Property, a festschrift for David Vaver, Hart (2010)
    • “Raising the Bar: a mistaken Chimera?” Chapter in Concurrence Santé Publique, Innovation et Médicament L.G.D.J lextenso editions (2010)
    • Be ye ever so High, a paper given to the First St.Petersberg Legal Forum, May 2011.
    • James v Kaney – where next? A paper for the Autumn 2011 Expert Witness Institute Journal.
    • IP Law: Keep Calm and Carry On, inaugural lecture, Current Legal Problems, vol 66 Issue 1 pp. 379-399
    • Patent thickets: a paper for the European Patent Office Economic and Scientific Advisory Board Meeting,  Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2013; doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jps213
    • Competition Authorities Support Grasshoppers: Competition Law as a Threat to Innovation, Competition Policy International Vol. 9 No. 2 p.15
    • Comments on the UN High-Level Panel Report on Access to Medicines Biotech Law Review Vol. 16 Issue 2 p.56 (2017) ISSN 1365-8867
    • Lessons from Huawei v ZTE, published on 4IP website October 2016
    • Registered Trade Marks – a System in Crisis and What’s to be done? [2022] 26 IPQ 169

Contact Rt.Hon. Professor Sir Robin Jacob's clerks

Whilst barristers have a designated practice management team, all the clerks have the capacity and knowledge to assist in cases involving all counsel.

Email the clerks