Advanced Bionics AG & Anr v Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte Gmbh [2022] EWHC 1345 (Pat)1 June 2022Andrew Lykiardopoulos QC appeared as lead counsel for the claimants (“Advanced Bionics”) in proceedings brought against the defendant (“Med-El”) to revoke a patent relating to MRI-safe disk magnets and/or a declaration that Advanced Bionics’ implant device did not infringe.  Med-El counterclaimed for infringement, with the proceedings conducted through the Shorter Trials Scheme. The trial in […]
Saint-Gobain Adfors SAS v 3M Innovative Properties Co [2022] EWHC 1018 (Pat)9 May 2022James Abrahams QC and Michael Conway successfully appeared for the claimant (“Saint-Gobain”) in a claim to revoke a European patent (“the Patent”) registered by the defendant (“3M”) for dish-shaped abrasive particles with a recessed surface. The Patent claimed that dish-shaped abrasive particles, with a sloping sidewall and a specific thickness ratio, increase the grinding performance […]
Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd & Anr v Teva UK Ltd [2022] EWHC 954 (Pat)26 April 2022Charlotte May QC successfully appeared as lead counsel for the defendant (“Teva”) in opposing an application for an interim injunction brought by the claimants (“Neurim”) for an order restraining Teva from disposing of, offering for sale, selling or supplying a generic version of Circadin. The hearing of the application had been expedited by Roth J. […]
Alcon Eye Care UK Ltd & Anr v AMO Development LLC [2022] EWHC 955 (Pat)26 April 2022Michael Tappin QC and Henry Ward appeared for the defendant and patentee (“AMO”) in legal proceeding brought by the claimants (“Alcon”) to revoke two patents for ophthalmic surgical systems used for carrying out cataract surgery.  Alcon’s validity attack was based on obviousness and insufficiency.  AMO counterclaimed for infringement of the patents by Alcon’s LenSx laser […]
easyGroup Ltd -v- Nuclei Ltd (t/a Easy Offices) & Ors [2022] EWHC 901 (Ch)13 April 2022Jaani Riordan successfully appeared as junior counsel led by Mark Vanhegan QC for the defendants (collectively, “Nuclei”) in proceedings brought by the claimant (“easyGroup”) alleging infringement of four EU and UK trade marks for EASYOFFICE in various forms (“the Trade Marks”).  The Trade Marks were registered in relation to services including hire and rental of […]