Ansari -v- Google UK Ltd & Ors [2022] EWHC 226 (Ch)13 February 2022Jaani Riordan appeared for the Defendants and Henry Edwards (led by Eric Metcalfe of Monckton Chambers) appeared for the Claimant (“Mr Ansari”) in an application made by the First Defendant (“Google UK”) to strike out or summarily dismiss Mr Ansari’s claims for copyright infringement, misuse of private information, breach of data protection legislation and breach […]
Mulsanne v Marshmallow [2022] EWHC 276 (Ch)11 February 2022Martin Howe QC leading Ashton Chantrielle appeared together with Aidan Christie QC and Martyn Naylor for the claimant in this complex claim for breach of confidence and trade secrets in the methodologies used by an automated ratings engine for the pricing of motor insurance premiums quoted on price comparison websites. There were also contractual claims […]
Lifestyle Equities v Santa Barbara Polo Club [2022] EWCA Civ 5128 January 2022Lindsay Lane KC appeared for the third, fourth and eighth defendants (collectively, “Santa Barbara”) in an appeal from the judgment of Hacon HHJ staying the claimants’ (“Lifestyle Equities”) claim for trade mark infringement and passing off pursuant to section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996. The claim concerned the alleged infringement of Lifestyle Equities’ EU […]
InterDigital Technology Corporation & Ors v Lenovo Group Limited [2022] EWHC 10 (Pat)6 January 2022Adrian Speck QC, Mark Chacksfield QC and Edmund Eustace appeared for the claimants (“InterDigital”) and James Abrahams QC and William Duncan appeared for the defendants (“Lenovo”) in Trial B in the ongoing proceedings between these parties.  In the wider proceedings, InterDigital seeks to have the Court determine the terms of a FRAND licence of its […]
Tehrani v Hamilton Bonaduz AG & Ors [2021] EWHC 3457 (IPEC)22 December 2021Henry Ward successfully appeared for the defendants (“Hamilton”) in proceedings brought by Professor Tehrani for the infringement of her patent relating to the method and apparatus for controlling a ventilator.  Hamilton counterclaimed for revocation of the patent on the grounds of lack of novelty, lack of inventive step and insufficiency. The patent related to the […]