Home > News > Recent cases

Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd [2017] EWHC 711 (Pat)4 May 2017Adrian Speck QC, Isabel Jamal and Tom Jones appeared for the Claimant, Unwired Planet, and Andrew Lykiardopoulos QC appeared for the Defendant, Huawei, in a landmark action concerning the nature of a patent holder’s obligations to license Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) on Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) terms.   In a much-anticipated judgment, Birss J […]
Glaxo Wellcome UK Limited v Sandoz Limited [2017] EWCA Civ 2276 April 2017Martin Howe QC and Iona Berkeley represented the Respondents, “Sandoz”, in Glaxo’s Appeal against the decision of HHJ Hacon refusing permission to join two additional defendants to its claim for passing off. Glaxo alleged passing off on the basis that Sandoz had marketed asthma inhalers similar to Glaxo’s ‘Seratide’ inhalers in the UK. Glaxo had […]
Fujifilm v Abbvie [2017] EWHC 395 (Pat)28 March 2017Michael Tappin QC, Andrew Lykiardopoulos QC and Mark Chacksfield appeared for the Defendant (“AbbVie”) in this action concerning certain of AbbVie’s patents and applications for the anti-inflammatory drug adalimumab (marketed by AbbVie as “Humira”). The Claimants (“FKB” and “SB/Biogen”) sought declarations (the “Declarations”) to the effect that use of their biosimilar adalimumab products in certain […]
Wobben v Siemens [2017] EWCA Civ 519 January 2017James Whyte represented the Respondents (collectively “Siemens”) in this appeal concerning Wobben’s patent for a method of operation of a wind turbine in high winds. At first instance Birss J had found that Wobben’s patent was obvious in light of a prior art research paper “Bossanyi”, which disclosed strategies to mitigate the effects of wind […]
Shanks v Unilever [2017] EWCA Civ 218 January 2017In Shanks v Unilever, the Court of Appeal dismissed Prof Shanks’ second tier appeal against the IPO’s rejection of his multi-million pound claim under s.40(1) of the Patents Act 1977 for inventor’s compensation against his former employer, Unilever, in respect of patents which he claimed to be of ‘outstanding benefit’ to Unilever. The patents were […]