Home

News

Football Dataco Ltd v Sportradar GmbH [2012] EWHC 1185 (Ch)30 March 2012Claim to joint liability for infringement of sui generis database right in live football data. Currently on appeal to the Court of Appeal.
Regeneron & Bayer v Genentech [2012] EWHC 65722 March 2012Regeneron and Bayer issued revocation and non-infringement proceedings against Genentech in relation to its patent for the use of VEGF antagonists to treat non-neoplastic diseases characterised by excessive angiogenesis. The patent was alleged to be anticipated or obvious over a paper which disclosed an antagonist to VEGF and which stated that the antagonist may have […]
Regeneron & Bayer v Genentech [2012] EWHC 65722 March 2012Regeneron and Bayer issued revocation and non-infringement proceedings against Genentech in relation to its patent for the use of VEGF antagonists to treat non-neoplastic diseases characterised by excessive angiogenesis. The patent was alleged to be anticipated or obvious over a paper which disclosed an antagonist to VEGF and which stated that the antagonist may have […]
Fine & Country Ltd v Okotoks Ltd [2012] EWHC 2230 (Ch)14 March 2012This was a three week trial concerning rival estate agents.  Mark Platts-Mills QC led Jessie Bowhill representing the Defendants in this passing off and trade mark infringement claim. The Defendants were found to have passed off their estate agency business as that of the Claimant and infringed the Claimants device mark comprising the words FINE & COUNTRY […]
Fine & Country Ltd v Okotoks Ltd [2012] EWHC 2230 (Ch)14 March 2012This was a three week trial concerning rival estate agents.  Mark Platts-Mills QC led Jessie Bowhill representing the Defendants in this passing off and trade mark infringement claim. The Defendants were found to have passed off their estate agency business as that of the Claimant and infringed the Claimants device mark comprising the words FINE & COUNTRY […]
MSD v. Teva [2012] EWHC 627 (Pat), [2012] FSR 248 March 2012What constitutes a threat to infringe a patent? Is the mere receipt of a marketing authorisation enough? Those were the questions raised by this matter. MSD is the owner of a patent and an SPC relating to Efavirenz, an anti-AIDS drug. Upon the receipt of an MA by Mark’s client, Teva, MSD wrote requesting confirmation […]
MSD v. Teva [2012] EWHC 627 (Pat), [2012] FSR 248 March 2012What constitutes a threat to infringe a patent? Is the mere receipt of a marketing authorisation enough? Those were the questions raised by this matter. MSD is the owner of a patent and an SPC relating to Efavirenz, an anti-AIDS drug. Upon the receipt of an MA by Mark’s client, Teva, MSD wrote requesting confirmation […]
HGS v Eli Lilly1 March 2012Michael Tappin QC
KCI Licensing Inc & Ors v Smith & Nephew Plc & Ors (2012)1 March 2012Henry Ward, representing KCI Licensing Inc, successfully applied for summary judgment on an issue in an enquiry for damages. The Respondent, having already admitted in the defence that the applicant was the registered proprietor of the patent in question, claimed that the applicant was not the patent owner. It was held that the applicant was […]
KCI Licensing Inc & Ors v Smith & Nephew Plc & Ors (2012)1 March 2012Henry Ward, representing KCI Licensing Inc, successfully applied for summary judgment on an issue in an enquiry for damages. The Respondent, having already admitted in the defence that the applicant was the registered proprietor of the patent in question, claimed that the applicant was not the patent owner. It was held that the applicant was […]