Home > News

News

Buhler AG -v- FP Spomax [2008] EWHC 823 (Ch)21 April 2008A patent infringement and validity case heard in February 2008, regarding a patent for a new ‘double roller’ grinding process method of milling flour for starch. The Defendant alleged that the patent was invalid for obviousness. The Judge held that the patent was obvious. Andrew Lykiardopoulos appeared on behalf of the successful Defendant.
Abbott Laboratories v Evysio Medical Devices ULC [2008] EWHC 800 (Pat)21 April 2008The Defendant had three patents relating to coronary stents. The Claimant sought a declaration of non-infringement of these patents in relation to its own coronary stent. The Defendant counter-claimed for infringement. The Claimant challenged the validity of the patents claiming that the patents were obvious, insufficient, the claims were not entitled to priority and that […]
JHP Limited v (1) BBC Worldwide Limited (2) Trustees of the Estate of Terry Nation [2008] EWHC 757 (Ch)16 April 2008Terry Nation created the characters called ‘Daleks’ for the BBC television series of Dr. Who. The Claimant, a book production company, made an agreement with Nation to publish three of his books about Daleks in the 1960s. Nation still developed stories about Daleks with the BBC before and after his agreement with JHP and after […]
Fisher -v- Brooker – ‘A Whiter Shade of Pale’ [2009] UKHL 414 April 2008This was a dispute about who wrote and who was entitled to rights in the music of the iconic Procol Harum hit Whiter Shade of Pale. Hammond organist Mathew Fisher claimed joint credit for the composition after 38 years during which he had been content for Gary Brooker to be recognized as the author. Despite […]
Honda Motor Co. Ltd and Honda Motor Europe Ltd -v- Derek James Neesam, Kevin David Neesam and D&K Motorcycles [2008] EWHC 338 (Ch)28 February 2008James Mellor QC and James Abrahams represented the Claimants in January 2008 in this action for parallel importing against the Fourth Defendant (as the Claimants had obtained summary judgment in relation to the other three Defendants). The issue at trial was whether the Claimant had given implied consent for the Fourth Defendant to put bikes […]