News

ITV Broadcasting Ltd v TVCatchup Ltd, Case C-607/117 March 2013James Mellor QC and Jessie Bowhill appeared for the claimants, Martin Howe QC for the defendant, and Charlotte May for the UK government. The ECJ answered the question of interpretation of Directive 2001/29 referred by Floyd J in the High Court, [2011] EWHC 2977 (Pat). The ECJ ruled that the internet streaming of free-to-air TV […]
In the Matter of Trade Mark Applications by Adelphoi Ltd (BATSMAN) [2012] 0-504-126 March 2013John Baldwin QC recently acted for DC Comics before the Intellectual Property Office in its successful opposition to an application to register the sign BATSMAN as a trade mark. The opposition was based on DC Comics’ prior Community trade mark registration for BATMAN in relation to (inter alia) “a wide variety of merchandise”. The Applicant, […]
In the Matter of Trade Mark Applications by Adelphoi Ltd (BATSMAN) [2012] 0-504-126 March 2013John Baldwin QC recently acted for DC Comics before the Intellectual Property Office in its successful opposition to an application to register the sign BATSMAN as a trade mark. The opposition was based on DC Comics’ prior Community trade mark registration for BATMAN in relation to (inter alia) “a wide variety of merchandise”. The Applicant, […]
Esge AG v OHIM (Case T 444/10)28 February 2013James St.Ville recently acted for De’Longhi Benelux SA as intervener before the Court of Justice of the European Union in ESGE AG v. OHIM (Case T 444/10). De’Longhi succeeded in overcoming relative grounds for opposing registration under Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009. De’Longhi, proprietor of the famous Kenwood family of kitchen mixers, […]
Esge AG v OHIM (Case T 444/10)28 February 2013James St.Ville recently acted for De’Longhi Benelux SA as intervener before the Court of Justice of the European Union in ESGE AG v. OHIM (Case T 444/10). De’Longhi succeeded in overcoming relative grounds for opposing registration under Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009. De’Longhi, proprietor of the famous Kenwood family of kitchen mixers, […]
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc and Bayer Pharma AG v Genentech Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 9327 February 2013Regeneron and Bayer appealed against the decision of Floyd J in  [2012] EWHC 657 (Pat)  which held Genentech’s patent valid and infringed by Regeneron’s product. On appeal, Kitchin LJ (Moses and Longmore LJJ agreeing) upheld the findings of Floyd J and dismissed the appeal. The patent claimed the use of human vascular endothelial growth factor […]
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc and Bayer Pharma AG v Genentech Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 9327 February 2013Regeneron and Bayer appealed against the decision of Floyd J in  [2012] EWHC 657 (Pat)  which held Genentech’s patent valid and infringed by Regeneron’s product. On appeal, Kitchin LJ (Moses and Longmore LJJ agreeing) upheld the findings of Floyd J and dismissed the appeal. The patent claimed the use of human vascular endothelial growth factor […]
A&E Television Networks LLC v Discovery Communications Europe Ltd [2013] EWHC 109 (Ch)26 February 2013John Baldwin QC and Charlotte May recently acted for the successful defendant in A&E Television Networks LLC v Discovery Communications Europe Ltd [2013] EWHC 109 (Ch), a trade mark and passing off dispute between rival documentary television channels. James Mellor QC and Lindsay Lane acted for the claimants. The claimants operate cable and satellite television […]
A&E Television Networks LLC v Discovery Communications Europe Ltd [2013] EWHC 109 (Ch)26 February 2013John Baldwin QC and Charlotte May recently acted for the successful defendant in A&E Television Networks LLC v Discovery Communications Europe Ltd [2013] EWHC 109 (Ch), a trade mark and passing off dispute between rival documentary television channels. James Mellor QC and Lindsay Lane acted for the claimants. The claimants operate cable and satellite television […]
Mark Platts-Mills QC panel member at seminar on Patent Litigation and Patent Procedure19 February 2013Mark Platts-Mills QC will be a panel member at  a seminar hosted by Pinsent Masons on 25th February 2013. The seminar will explore the most significant changes brought about by the America Invents Act and will among other things explore comparisons with the proposed Unitary Patent Court (UPC). For information on the seminar click here.